This entry is cross-posted at the request of the Genderfloomp organizers, and comment streams are available on Dreamwidth and Livejournal.
Hi there. As the organizers of the annual Genderfloomp party at WisCon,
we learned of a recent wave of concern that Genderfloomp is
uncomfortable/appropriative for gender non-conforming or non-binary
people. We'd like to open a discussion about this issue.
To start
off, we want to determine if the problems primarily reside in the
party's messaging online, its actual setup/conduct at the con, or simply
its existence. We've spoken to some GNC/GQ people who really enjoy the
party and find it to be an important space, and we would find it helpful
to hear what aspects of the party do work as well. Ideally, we can find
a way to rework Genderfloomp so that it can serve the entire community,
but we also are open to much bigger changes.
We are both queer
people who are gender non-conforming in some ways that are important to
our identity, but do not pretend that this gives us access to the wide
spectrum of GNC, GQ, and trans* experiences. Our intentions with
Genderfloomp are to embrace the liberatory aspects of "party," rather
than the trivializing connotations, in order to foster a space of gender
play and binary destabilization, much in the same way that the Tiptree
award celebrates work that "explores and expands" ideas of gender. If
our party is hurting GNC/GQ folks, it is failing at its mission, and we
apologize for any hurt we have caused.
We know a wide spectrum of
Wiscon has insight to share on Genderfloomp, but we ask that this
thread be restricted to folks who identify as GNC/GQ/Trans* in order to
give people room and safety to speak. If commenting here feels
uncomfortable or unsafe, we
can also be reached at genderfloomp@gmail.com.
We are here primarily to listen with humility and openness, though we are also happy to answer any questions.
Sincerely,
Meghan McCarron and Liz Gorinsky
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
